Friday, May 25, 2012

Honestly Opinionated


Honestly Opinionated


I don’t think I have ever read book reviews on Amazon.com before (I didn’t even know there were so many people who took time to write them). To be honest, I usually read books because my friends or family tell me they’re good. I decided to research the book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. The book overall got 4 out of 5 stars. I personally probably would have given it 5, but the rare few who gave the book a 2 or a 1 have drastically different views from those who saw this book as inspirational. Between two reviews that are entitled “changes the way I see the world” and “extremely thought provoking” there is a review called “what did I just read?” This person says, “If the book was written intentionally this bad so the reader would be driven to burn the book in some kind of elaborate ironic metaphor, then maybe I get it.” Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. However judging by the quality of this sentence, I don’t think I would trust this reader. How much of an impact does well written sentences and proper english have on the reader of these book reviews? I think that says more about the reader than the opinion in the review.

 There is also the question whether these book reviews are really in response to the book or are just responding to other book reviews. In one review I read, right after a poor review, the reviewer said “It’s short and sweet and makes you think, if you are capable of thinking.” I feel this is a stab at the readers who disliked the novel. Also, I think that may be a little uncalled for because the review right before his was a high schooler. Can we really trust the reviews of these books if they are written by what could be 12 year-olds? Are their opinions important?


 I believe in writing, as in any art form, there is an ideal audience. However, it is important to see the opposing viewpoint. I am sure authors learn a great deal, not only from the good reviews but especially from the bad reviews. But, do authors change their writing style or storylines to fit those who are discontent with their previous novels? Should they? On Amazon anyone can click on a reviewer and see everything they have ever reviewed. Many of the people who have reviews, review almost everything they buy whether it be novels or soundtracks.

Anyone can see what they have reviewed, and could even judge their review on the kind of other things they review. If I had a common interest in books or movies as a reviewer I definitely think that would sway my opinion of them to trust their recommendations. Although there are some who dislike the book very much, would that persuade you from not reading the book if there are still good reviews? (And vice versa?) There is such access to these reviews with the internet now and people are not afraid to voice their own opinion. I think this is ultimately helpful to not only readers but authors as well.

2 comments:

  1. I don't like the fact that some people are not well qualified to write the reviews, and focus on superfluous details that to them makes the whole book bad. However, I do agree that book reviews may be helpful to the authors too, but they should not change their writing style just for a few people who detest their book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think well written sentences have a huge impact on how people read reviews. It gives the impression that maybe the writer of that review did not really understand the book.

    ReplyDelete