As I was trying to find a unique form of art to explore that also serves as social commentary, I stumbled upon Kenneth Tin-Kin Hung's Page. He uses popular culture, political figures, historical references and imagery found on the internet to a new image or video that questions identity, politics, sexuality and power. You might ask if this is real art since he is essentially using someone's original piece to supplement his own. I would say it is still is. His art has a motive, while others seem to don't (David Smith's sculptures as seen above) ...
Back to Kenneth's art, the piece I will focus on is his "The Fast Supper" and "Fat Free Nirvana". He is depicting the contemporary societal problem of obesity by using historical references. He satirizes the famous "Last Supper" painting by Leonardo da Vinci by showing Jesus consuming large amounts of fast food and unhealthy snacks, growing more and more obese until he finally explodes. This definitely fits into the category of social criticism because he is trying to raise awareness about the dangers of obesity. The fact that he used a famous religious event to parallel this growing issue is to relate the magnitude of the fast food industry in American society. Another detail is that all the foods on the table are labeled with religious terms and symbols, which seems to say that Americans treat their fast food as a way of life, like religion. The explosion of Jesus symbolizes his core message that Americans need to adopt better eating habits and stop the dependency on fat, greasy foods before health problems kill everyone.
For it to be effective, social critique should be reproduced and distributed to the masses. Hung does exactly this because the two videos are available to anyone around the world with Internet access. Granted not everyone has access to the Internet when considering third world countries, but computers are becoming more prevalent in our lives. I think art can produce "real" political, social change if the medium can be widely seen by everyone and internet is certainly the way to go for this. Art does provide a social good even with Kesha's Animal album. She has a song entitled "We R Who We R" and it can be interpreted to mean "be yourself". Granted her other songs on the album are more provocative and doesn't offer socially good messages (i.e. "Take It Off"). Nevertheless, classical music, such as Mozart might do society more good than popular music like Kesha, but they are both still forms of art. Both of the artists spend time creating their sounds intended for an audience to hear it. What do you think of Kesha's music as art?
Do you think social criticism will become more prevalent in art form?
I would agree that all art should be judged by its intention. However, the beauty of art is that we can interpret it in any way we personally feel is correct. So, when to referring to Ke$ha's music as art I would agree that it is an art form, however I would not agree that it even comes close in complexity to Mozart's Requiem.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Chelsea that although the intentions of the creator should be taken into account when considering a piece of art, there can't be a "wrong" interpretation when it comes to art.
ReplyDelete